Lets face facts the Brussels Journal often tends to make mountains out of hills. But detailing the real death of democratic process in the EU they tend to be spot on. So I am a tad on the hesitant side to buy into the claim that the EU is part of a plan for the final victory of socialism over liberal democratic capitalism… but it makes some intresting points.
PB: But all these countries that joined the European Union did so voluntarily.
VB: No, they did not. Look at Denmark which voted against the Maastricht treaty twice. Look at Ireland [which voted against the Nice treaty]. Look at many other countries, they are under enormous pressure. It is almost blackmail. Switzerland was forced to vote five times in a referendum. All five times they have rejected it, but who knows what will happen the sixth time, the seventh time. It is always the same thing. It is a trick for idiots. The people have to vote in referendums until the people vote the way that is wanted. Then they have to stop voting. Why stop? Let us continue voting. The European Union is what Americans would call a shotgun marriage.
I’m not sure I tend to buy into the fact a country making a legitimate choice being a choice, but certainly agree with him that on many EU iniatives their are large scale threats and pronouncement of doom upon the populace if they fail to vote the way the EU tells them.
However people voting until they vote the right way does indeed show itself as a halmark of the EU system. And thats whats scary as heck about it to me.
PB: But we have a European Parliament which is chosen by the people.
VB: The European Parliament is elected on the basis of proportional representation, which is not true representation. And what does it vote on? The percentage of fat in yoghurt, that kind of thing. It is ridiculous. It is given the task of the Supreme Soviet. The average MP can speak for six minutes per year in the Chamber. That is not a real parliament.
I don’t know where he got the “average MP can speak for 6 minutes” bit but he is dead on that the parliament isn’t real. And it isn’t real by necessity and by design….
But unelected and unaccountable buercrats -do- run things. and there we have a problem. The Parliament needs to be a check on the Buercrats some how for the EU to be democratic
but now for the WWWWWILLLLDDDDD conspiracy angle
Therefore the only way to withstand this onslaught of wild capitalism (as they called it) was to try to introduce the same socialist goals in all countries at once. Prior to that, the left-wing parties and the Soviet Union had opposed European integration very much because they perceived it as a means to block their socialist goals. From 1985 onwards they completely changed their view. The Soviets came to a conclusion and to an agreement with the left-wing parties that if they worked together they could hijack the whole European project and turn it upside down. Instead of an open market they would turn it into a federal state.
According to the [secret Soviet] documents, 1985-86 is the turning point. I have published most of these documents. You might even find them on the internet. But the conversations they had are really eye opening. For the first time you understand that there is a conspiracy – quite understandable for them, as they were trying to save their political hides.
I’m not sure that I buy the conspiracy angle. But an Angle where the Leftist/Socialist parties decided to make “Europe” their platform to advance their ideas and policies in a way to fight of Neo-Liberalist movements…. I got to say that makes sense. Doesn’t have to be a conspiracy at all but rather a political consensus.
Now they may not want to admit this consensus came under the tutilage of moscow but hey… their is nothing wrong with that
However the Speech and the article do point to some good similarities between EUism and Sovietism
It is no accident that the European Parliament, for example, reminds me of the Supreme Soviet. It looks like the Supreme Soviet because it was designed like it. Similary, when you look at the European Commission it looks like the Politburo. I mean it does so exactly, except for the fact that the Commission now has 25 members and the Politburo usually had 13 or 15 members. Apart from that they are exactly the same, unaccountable to anyone, not directly elected by anyone at all. When you look into all this bizarre activity of the European Union with its 80,000 pages of regulations it looks like Gosplan. We used to have an organisation which was planning everything in the economy, to the last nut and bolt, five years in advance. Exactly the same thing is happening in the EU. When you look at the type of EU corruption, it is exactly the Soviet type of corruption, going from top to bottom rather than going from bottom to top…….
Vladimir Bukovsky: I am referrring to structures, to certain ideologies being instilled, to the plans, the direction, the inevitable expansion, the obliteration of nations, which was the purpose of the Soviet Union. Most people do not understand this. They do not know it, but we do because we were raised in the Soviet Union where we had to study the Soviet ideology in school and at university. The ultimate purpose of the Soviet Union was to create a new historic entity, the Soviet people, all around the globe. The same is true in the EU today. They are trying to create a new people. They call this people “Europeans”, whatever that means.
According to Communist doctrine as well as to many forms of Socialist thinking, the state, the national state, is supposed to wither away. In Russia, however, the opposite happened. Instead of withering away the Soviet state became a very powerful state, but the nationalities were obliterated. But when the time of the Soviet collapse came these suppressed feelings of national identity came bouncing back and they nearly destroyed the country. It was so frightening.
So I don’t by the conspiracy angle but the comparison is fairly instructive on the War on Democracy going on right now in Europe
Once we bring Democracy to the Middle East I hope we can bring it to Europe